Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: FOMITH (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location IT
Geographical representativeness description Spatial representativeness: Italy. Professional and industrial use (B2B).
Reference year 2026
Name
FOMITH
Use advice for data set Cradle to grave with options. Modules declared: A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, C1, C2, C3, C4, D. Modules not declared: B1-B7.
Technical purpose of product or process The FOAMCEM product family (FOAMCEM, FOAMCEM-H, FOMITH and FOMITH-G) consists of liquid foaming agents obtained through controlled mixing of water with organic and inorganic raw materials, including protein derivatives, surfactants, resins and mineral salts. Designed for the production of lightweight cementitious and gypsum-based materials. Applications: cellular concrete, foamed concrete, lightweight cementitious systems, gypsum-based prefabricated products. Intended for professional and industrial use (B2B). "• FOAMCEM: water 51%, protein-based raw materials 24%, additives 18%, solvent 2%, packaging (IBC) 5%. Produced via controlled alkaline hydrolysis (80–100°C). • FOAMCEM-H: water 65%, surfactant 22%, keratin hydrolysate 7%, packaging (IBC) 6%. Produced by mechanical blending. • FOMITH: water 65%, surfactant 22%, keratin hydrolysate 7%, packaging (IBC) 6%. Produced by mechanical blending. • FOMITH-G: water 69%, surfactant 21%, functional additives 4%, packaging (IBC) 6%. Produced by manual mixing."
General comment on data set 1 kg of foaming agent. 1 kilogram of keratin hydrolysate-based liquid foaming agent, same use and functions as above. Overall quality: Very Good. Weighted DQR: FOAMCEM 2.08, FOAMCEM-H 2.02, FOMITH 2.03, FOMITH-G 2.06. Generic datasets: Ecoinvent 3.11 (cut-off allocation), SimaPro 10.2. No "poor" or "very poor" datasets. No "fair" dataset contributes >30% to any core indicator. Mass-based allocation applied exclusively to electricity consumption in A3 (excluding FOMITH-G, directly attributed). All other flows directly attributed based on product-specific primary data. No cut-off rules applied. All flows considered relevant. LCI data cover =95% of total mass and energy flows.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 0.018 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 0.0 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2031
Time representativeness description "2026-06-17" - "2031-06-17"
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system "• Foaming agent dosage: 1–2% by mass of lightweight cellular concrete. • Density of cellular concrete: 300–500 kg/m³. • Foaming agent density: FOAMCEM 1.13 kg/L; FOAMCEM-H, FOMITH, FOMITH-G: 1.01 kg/L. • Typical applications: screeds, roofs and terrace slopes, fillings, road sub-base."

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Raw material supply
A1
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 0.498
  • 0.00239
  • 0.993
  • 0.0106
  • 0.101
  • 0.000354
  • 0.00426
  • 0.0129
  • 0.0000696
  • -0.107
Input
  • 0.0057
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.503
  • 0.00239
  • 0.993
  • 0.0106
  • 0.101
  • 0.000354
  • 0.00426
  • 0.0129
  • 0.0000696
  • -0.107
Input
  • 4.12
  • 0.151
  • 6.21
  • 0.674
  • 0.709
  • 0.0577
  • 0.27
  • 0.404
  • 0.00766
  • -2.67
Input
  • 1.44
  • 0
  • 1.52
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 5.56
  • 0.151
  • 7.72
  • 0.674
  • 0.709
  • 0.0577
  • 0.27
  • 0.404
  • 0.00766
  • -2.67
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.00354
  • 0.0000189
  • 0.694
  • 0.0000842
  • 0.0993
  • 0.00000407
  • 0.0000337
  • -0.00213
  • 0.00000795
  • -0.00105
Output
  • 0.000236
  • 0.00000382
  • 0.00039
  • 0.000017
  • 0.000443
  • 5.4E-7
  • 0.00000681
  • 0.0000873
  • 1.12E-7
  • -0.0000724
Output
  • 0.0182
  • 0.00725
  • 0.044
  • 0.0323
  • 0.00782
  • 0.0000389
  • 0.0129
  • 0.82
  • 0.05
  • -0.00927
Output
  • 0.00000635
  • 4.45E-8
  • 0.0000259
  • 1.98E-7
  • 0.00000301
  • 6.03E-9
  • 7.93E-8
  • 2.91E-7
  • 1.12E-9
  • -0.00000178
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.000513
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0529
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.95
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00718
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 5.56
  • 0.151
  • 7.72
  • 0.674
  • 0.709
  • 0.0577
  • 0.27
  • 0.404
  • 0.00766
  • -2.67
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.0000019
  • 3.6E-8
  • 0.00000214
  • 1.6E-7
  • 2.53E-7
  • 1.58E-9
  • 6.41E-8
  • 6.13E-8
  • 4.58E-10
  • -7.46E-7
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 0.00124
  • 0.0000342
  • 0.00175
  • 0.000153
  • 0.000204
  • 0.0000396
  • 0.0000611
  • 0.000177
  • 0.00000219
  • -0.000436
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 1.08E-8
  • 2.33E-10
  • 8.08E-9
  • 1.04E-9
  • 7.14E-10
  • 6.6E-11
  • 4.15E-10
  • 5.56E-10
  • 9E-12
  • -3.38E-9
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.0000804
  • 7.28E-7
  • 0.000204
  • 0.00000325
  • 0.0000228
  • 1.43E-7
  • 0.0000013
  • 0.0000152
  • 2.74E-8
  • -0.0000451
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.000245
  • 0.0000115
  • 0.000354
  • 0.0000514
  • 0.0000432
  • 0.0000184
  • 0.0000206
  • 0.0000581
  • 8.41E-7
  • -0.0000968
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 0.00213
  • 0.000125
  • 0.00344
  • 0.000559
  • 0.000405
  • 0.000202
  • 0.000224
  • 0.00063
  • 0.00000919
  • -0.000993
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • -0.00941
  • 0.00000732
  • -0.00119
  • 0.0000326
  • 0.00121
  • 8.97E-7
  • 0.000013
  • 0.000081
  • 0.0659
  • -0.000342
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 0.261
  • 0.0107
  • 0.385
  • 0.0476
  • 0.0646
  • 0.00443
  • 0.019
  • 0.0228
  • 0.000313
  • -0.123
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.00632
  • 0.00000353
  • 0.000777
  • 0.0000157
  • 0.0000607
  • 4.53E-7
  • 0.0000063
  • 0.00000991
  • 1.78E-7
  • -0.0000733
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 0.256
  • 0.0107
  • 0.384
  • 0.0476
  • 0.0659
  • 0.00443
  • 0.019
  • 0.0229
  • 0.000313
  • -0.123
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.00122
  • 0.0000519
  • 0.00143
  • 0.000232
  • 0.000134
  • 0.0000604
  • 0.0000926
  • 0.000213
  • 0.00000332
  • -0.000548
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 0.125
  • 0.000587
  • 29.7
  • 0.00262
  • 4.25
  • 0.000123
  • 0.00105
  • -0.1
  • 0.000334
  • -0.123

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 1.46
  • 0.02
  • 1.41
  • 0.0894
  • 0.128
  • 0.00313
  • 0.0358
  • 0.136
  • 0.000554
  • -0.544
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 1.78E-10
  • 2E-12
  • 3.58E-10
  • 8E-12
  • 3.9E-11
  • 0
  • 3E-12
  • 6E-12
  • 0
  • -9.3E-11
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 2.22E-9
  • 9.4E-11
  • 1.33E-8
  • 4.2E-10
  • 1.79E-9
  • 7E-12
  • 1.68E-10
  • 3.14E-10
  • 1E-12
  • -1.46E-9
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 0.0248
  • 0.00018
  • 0.101
  • 0.000804
  • 0.0118
  • 0.0000246
  • 0.000322
  • 0.00115
  • 0.00000459
  • -0.00703
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 1.06E-8
  • 8.53E-10
  • 2.14E-8
  • 3.8E-9
  • 2.1E-9
  • 1.13E-9
  • 1.52E-9
  • 1.05E-8
  • 5E-11
  • -7.1E-9
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 1.41
  • 0.0894
  • 2.01
  • 0.399
  • 0.171
  • 0.00383
  • 0.159
  • 0.58
  • 0.0151
  • -0.338