Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Galfan-coated steel wire mesh: ARRFORT (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location IT
Geographical representativeness description europe
Reference year 2026
Name
Galfan-coated steel wire mesh: ARRFORT
Use advice for data set cradle to gate with modules C1-C4 and D: A1, A2, A3, C1, C2, C3, C4, D
Technical purpose of product or process The product covered by the EPD is a steel nets with Galfan (95% Zinc and 5% Aluminum) coat used for soil and environmental protection "ARRFORT is a double-twisted wire mesh rockfall net designed for slope stabilization works. The product exhibits superior performance characteristics compared to traditional rockfall meshes. The system can be used both as a rockfall protection solution for stabilizing rocky slopes and as an anti-erosion geocomposite on slopes composed of weathered lithoid or mixed materials, as well as for embankment erosion control. In these applications, it provides performance improvements of up to 50% compared to conventional double-twisted rockfall meshes. ARRFORT has an average puncture resistance of 101 kN (in accordance with UNI EN 11437:2012). The ARRFORT system allows designers to use standard double-twisted mesh systems even for solving problems involving higher energy levels than those typically handled by conventional meshes. This expands the range of possible applications while reducing the need to overspecify materials. The ARRFORT rockfall mesh is made of double-twisted hexagonal wire mesh with an 8 × 10 cm aperture, manufactured from steel wire with a diameter of 3.40 mm and coated with a Zinc-Aluminum eutectic alloy (Galfan coating). It is produced in compliance with EU Regulation No. 305/2011 (formerly Directive 89/106/EEC) and the “Guidelines for the certification of technical suitability for the use of double-twisted wire mesh products” issued by the Italian Superior Council of Public Works (Cons. Sup. LL. PP. No. 69/2013). The product is CE marked in accordance with ETA 15/0812 for the following applications: stabilization of unstable slopes, control and prevention of rock and debris falls, soil and asphalt reinforcement, and erosion control systems along roads, highways, and railways."
General comment on data set 1 kg of the analysed products The EPD covers the following product: Galfan-coated steel mesh ARRFORT, manufactured at a plant in Calolziocorte (LC), which opened in 1950 and provided data for the year 2024. The product is manufactured using special machines for the production of metal mesh, and the site is powered by electricity from the grid, solar photovoltaic systems, and a boiler for space heating. The EPD cover the upstream production phase and the end-of-life phase in Italy. The background data was taken from the Ecoinvent 3.11 database. During the evaluation of the relevant data, using EN 15804:2012+A2:2019, Annex E, Table E.1, no data classified as fair, poor, or very poor was found (reference: UNI EN 15941:2024, Annex C, Example 3). In accordance with EN 15804:2012+A2:2019 paragraph 6.3.8.3, the relevant data contribute to 80% of the impact of at least one of the main environmental indicators considered, throughout the entire life cycle, excluding module D. Based on the produced mass No cut-offs were applied
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 0.0 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 0.0 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2031
Time representativeness description "2026-04-16" - "2031-04-16"
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system "Product composition: Steel: 9.54E-01 kg/UD Aluminium: 2.00E-03 kg/UD Zinc: 4.30E-02 kg/UD"

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Raw material supply
A1
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 1.758
  • 0.008323
  • 0.0006084
  • 0.04463
  • 0.004404
  • 0
  • 0.0002945
  • -0.5464
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 1.758
  • 0.008323
  • 0.0006084
  • 0.04463
  • 0.004404
  • 0
  • 0.0002945
  • -0.5464
Input
  • 10.92
  • 0.04008
  • 0.002171
  • 0.2756
  • 0.02121
  • 0
  • 0.00175
  • -6.371
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 10.92
  • 0.04008
  • 0.002171
  • 0.2756
  • 0.02121
  • 0
  • 0.00175
  • -6.371
Input
  • 0.6048
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.03048
  • 0.00006323
  • 0.000006283
  • 0.0004958
  • 0.00003346
  • 0
  • 0.00002652
  • -0.008588
Output
  • 0.002901
  • 0.00001287
  • 0.00006112
  • 0.00006628
  • 0.000006811
  • 0
  • 0.00001318
  • -0.0009951
Output
  • 0.1427
  • 0.02444
  • 0.01472
  • 0.004778
  • 0.01293
  • 0
  • 0.1437
  • -0.09462
Output
  • 0.00002638
  • 1.5E-7
  • 1.435E-8
  • 7.41E-7
  • 7.935E-8
  • 0
  • 4.462E-9
  • -0.000007164
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.8252
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0000876
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.007115
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 10.93
  • 0.04009
  • 0.002172
  • 0.2756
  • 0.02121
  • 0
  • 0.00175
  • -6.371
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.00008203
  • 1.212E-7
  • 4.478E-9
  • 1.941E-7
  • 6.415E-8
  • 0
  • 1.794E-9
  • -0.00002618
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 0.06974
  • 0.0001154
  • 0.00001766
  • 0.002198
  • 0.00006107
  • 0
  • 0.000007789
  • -0.003869
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 2.63E-8
  • 7.84E-10
  • 6.7E-11
  • 8.075E-9
  • 4.15E-10
  • 0
  • 3E-11
  • -4.544E-9
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.00006519
  • 2.633E-7
  • 1.459E-8
  • 0.000001902
  • 1.393E-7
  • 0
  • 1.137E-8
  • -0.00003319
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.003516
  • 0.00003843
  • 0.000007548
  • 0.0009439
  • 0.00002033
  • 0
  • 0.000002972
  • -0.0008824
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 0.2967
  • 0.0004227
  • 0.00008272
  • 0.01037
  • 0.0002237
  • 0
  • 0.00003264
  • -0.01002
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • 0.001801
  • 0.000006863
  • 5.509E-7
  • 0.00005472
  • 0.000003631
  • 0
  • 3.646E-7
  • -0.0007137
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 1.872
  • 0.03595
  • 0.00307
  • 0.5486
  • 0.01902
  • 0
  • 0.001118
  • -0.927
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.008608
  • 0.00001191
  • 4.811E-7
  • 0.00005563
  • 0.000006299
  • 0
  • 6.561E-7
  • -0.0009597
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 1.883
  • 0.03597
  • 0.003071
  • 0.5487
  • 0.01903
  • 0
  • 0.001119
  • -0.9287
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.006123
  • 0.0001751
  • 0.00003287
  • 0.00353
  • 0.00009262
  • 0
  • 0.00001168
  • -0.003286
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 1.176
  • 0.001977
  • 0.0002208
  • 0.01512
  • 0.001046
  • 0
  • 0.001226
  • -0.317

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 32.82
  • 0.06758
  • 0.0025
  • 0.384
  • 0.03576
  • 0
  • 0.04718
  • -9.455
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 2.29E-9
  • 6E-12
  • 0
  • 3.5E-10
  • 3E-12
  • 0
  • 9E-12
  • -1.218E-9
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 2.606E-8
  • 3.18E-10
  • 7E-12
  • 1.277E-9
  • 1.68E-10
  • 0
  • 2.03E-10
  • -9.787E-9
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 0.03829
  • 0.0002202
  • 0.00001903
  • 0.001177
  • 0.0001165
  • 0
  • 0.000007154
  • -0.01126
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 7.361E-7
  • 2.861E-9
  • 4.54E-10
  • 4.007E-8
  • 1.514E-9
  • 0
  • 1.78E-10
  • -8.378E-8
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 5.675
  • 0.3014
  • 0.007237
  • 0.4698
  • 0.1595
  • 0
  • 0.06281
  • -3.078